Prosecution- Diane Arbus
- Prejudiced highlighting a vulnerable and strange/ disabled individuals.
- Twins, Disabled.
- Highlighting and singling them out making them seen abnormal when they are still regular humans.
- Her work is to provoke an opinions on the subjects.
- Exploiting these individuals and hasn't provided or given some agreement/ friendship but used them to make money.
- Not raising awareness of the problems but using interesting people to make interesting images.
- Would you be happy if these were pictures of you.
- Daughter used her work for money tarnishing her mothers name. The book Untitled 24 years off.
Defence- Richard Prince
- On social media for anyone to see and use. Becomes an image of instagram.
- Comments on work to provide some form of creative control and to change the meaning and focus of the image.
- Still gave credit to the accounts it was posted on.
- An account was selling an image for £90 but some of Richards work for $100,000. The account should have watermarked their work to protect the image.
- Link the image to a website where copyright law can come into effect.
- Not paying for the photo more interested in his comment wanting his art.
- People are flattered to be chosen and a quote from one of the subjects 'it was an honour'.
- It is similar to sharing any news or other pages/ tweets except we don't change anything but he has commented making a change.
- Instagram say that if there is a problem contact them directly as there is different copyright laws.
Truth vs Deception
Lorca di Corcia- Faces
Art Quest
Comments
Post a Comment